Pfizer & Moderna Fail To Respond To BMJ About Serious COVID Vaccine Safety Concern

Image: 123RF

In Brief

  • The Facts:
    • Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal Dr. Peter Doshi explains that both Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to questions about why bio-distribution studies were not conducted prior to the rollout of their COVID vaccines.

    • Several doctors have pointed out that COVID vaccines, and their ingredients, are ending up in unexpected areas of the body.

  • Reflect On:
    • What are the implications of spike protein creation in unintended areas of the body?

    • Why are so many people unaware of certain COVID vaccine safety concerns being raised by experts?

Pause - set your Pulse...

Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An article published in the British Medical Journal by Dr. Peter Doshi titled “Covid-19 Vaccines: In The Rush for Regulatory Approval, Do We Need More Data?” raises concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and one of them is the bio-distribution of the vaccine. 

Bio-distribution refers to the examination and study of where the vaccine and its ingredients go once injected into the body. Having sped up the approval process of these vaccines, it has been claimed that no compromises in the process of examining their safety were made. But the fact that no study for tracking the distribution of the vaccine within the human body was conducted for any of the authorized vaccines, we cannot say this is true.

Dr. Doshi points out that such bio-distribution studies are a standard practice of drug safety testing but “are usually not required for vaccines.”

As an example as to why bio-distribution is important, research regarding the bio-distribution of aluminum containing vaccines have raised concerns about injected aluminum crossing the blood brain barrier and being distributed throughout the body where it can be detected years after injection. This is important, because vaccines are a different method of delivery than say, ingested aluminum, which the body does a great job of getting rid of through digestion.

Bio-distribution studies weren’t performed for COVID vaccines because data from past studies performed with related, and “mostly unapproved compounds that use the same platform technology” were used to bypass them. Essentially, somewhat similar studies were done and thus new studies were skipped.

Dr. Doshi points out that,

“Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to The BMJ’s questions regarding why no biodistribution studies were conducted on their novel mRNA products, and none of the companies, nor the FDA, would say whether new biodistribution studies will be required prior to licensure.”

In his article, Dr. Doshi also references a report that Pfizer provided to the Japanese government. In the report there is a table containing lipid nanoparticle bio-distribution data.

According to Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph,

This table shows where their surrogate “vaccine” (i.e. represented in the laboratory test by little bubbles of surrogate fat containing an analytical detection marker) ended up in the body of immunized rats, used in the laboratory as surrogates for humans…I would like to highlight some observations. First…a lot of the surrogate vaccine dose remained at the injection site, as one would expect. Remarkably, however, most of the vaccine dose had gone elsewhere….50-75% of the vaccine dose failed to remain at the site of injection. The big question is, where did it go? Looking at the other tissues shows some of the paces it went and accumulated…The surrogate vaccine was circulating in the blood. There is also evidence that a substantial amount of the vaccine went to places like the spleen, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands, and bone marrow. The vaccine went to other places as well, such as testes, lungs, intestines, kidneys, thyroid glands, pituitary gland, uterus, etc. The surrogate vaccine tested in a laboratory setting was widely distributed throughout the laboratory animal’s bodies. – Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Viral Immunologist, University of Guelph.

The above quote comes from a detailed report Bridle recently released for COVID-19: “A Vaccine Guide For Parents.” One of his main concerns, according to data he provides, is the spike protein that our cells manufacture after injection may enter into the bloodstream, and that the spike protein itself isn’t harmless. He goes into a detailed explanation in the report cited above.

According to him,

This information is incredibly important because recent data have come to light that the spike protein is “biologically active.” This means that the spike protein is not just an antigen that is recognized the immune system as being foreign. It means that the spike protein, itself, can interact with receptors throughout the body, called ACE2 receptors, potentially causing undesirable effects such as damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, blood clots, bleeding, and neurological effects.

Now, it’s important to mention that Bridle himself has been subjected to fact checking, big time. Many of his claims have come under fire, and have been strongly opposed by what seems to be a concerted effort to discredit him. In fact, an entire website was made dedicated to attacking him and claiming he is spreading misinformation. If you’d like to see the responses to Bridles claims, you can do so here.

It’s important to mention that Bridle is not the only one who is raising these concerns, there are many scientists and doctors all over the globe who have done the same. These experts are also subjected to fact checking and commonly ridiculed within the mainstream. Furthermore, they are heavily censored.

It’s important to note however, that many of their claims are not debunked.

A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.

Certain discussions, today, are simply not allowed to be had. Experts who raise concerns are constantly fact checked, and the mainstream is usually completely unaware of these supposed concerns that are being raised. This leaves the general populace unaware of the varying perspectives out there that can help them make informed decisions.

Dive Deeper

Our new 8 week course called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking' instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino is here.

If you want build your self awareness, improve your critical thinking, and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course.Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Related Posts


Join our newsletter to keep your finger on The Pulse!

You have Successfully Subscribed!